UXRP vs. CBON
UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) and CBON (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index, while CBON is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UXRP returned -94.69% vs 9.19% for CBON. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UXRP charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CBON.
Performance
UXRP vs. CBON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXRP achieves a -77.99% return, which is significantly lower than CBON's 5.60% return.
UXRP
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -74.16%
- YTD
- -77.99%
- 1Y
- -94.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.38%
CBON
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 9.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $134.57K | $162.86K | $181.24K | |
| $852.19K | $746.96K | $1.32M |
UXRP vs. CBON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -77.99% | -77.43% |
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 5.60% | 3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXRP and CBON is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXRP vs. CBON — Risk / Return Rank
UXRP
CBON
UXRP vs. CBON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXRP | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.53 | -0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 7.18 | -8.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 27.79 | -29.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXRP vs. CBON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXRP drawdown since its inception was -96.60%, which is greater than CBON's maximum drawdown of -14.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXRP and CBON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXRP | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.60% | -14.13% | -82.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.74% | -1.34% | -94.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.51% | -0.04% | -96.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.97% | -3.94% | -71.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 76.79% | 0.35% | +76.44% |
Volatility
UXRP vs. CBON - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a higher volatility of 24.70% compared to VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF (CBON) at 1.22%. This indicates that UXRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXRP | CBON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.70% | 1.22% | +23.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 101.23% | 2.76% | +98.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 142.99% | 3.59% | +139.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 4.87% | +138.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 5.54% | +137.97% |
UXRP vs. CBON - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXRP has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than CBON's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXRP vs. CBON - Dividend Comparison
UXRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CBON's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBON VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF | 1.37% | 1.66% | 2.15% | 3.01% | 2.70% | 3.05% | 2.87% | 3.87% | 3.39% | 3.33% | 3.25% | 2.78% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXRP and CBON have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXRP has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to CBON (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXRP dropped -96.60% vs CBON's -14.13%.
On 1-year performance, CBON leads with 9.19% vs -94.69% for UXRP. On fees, CBON is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CBON has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CBON has performed better with a 9.19% return vs -94.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBON is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
CBON has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
UXRP is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while CBON is Emerging Markets Bonds. UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index, while CBON tracks ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.67% for UXRP and 0.50% for CBON.
CBON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXRP and CBON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer