UXPIX vs. SHPIX
UXPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund) and SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX returned -21.39%/yr vs 8.80%/yr for SHPIX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXPIX achieves a -19.40% return, which is significantly lower than SHPIX's -17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX has underperformed SHPIX with an annualized return of -21.39%, while SHPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.80% annualized return.
UXPIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -19.40%
- 6M
- -18.70%
- 1Y
- -34.09%
- 3Y*
- -24.71%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- -21.39%
SHPIX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -17.55%
- 6M
- -15.52%
- 1Y
- -28.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 47.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | -19.40% | -40.68% | -0.70% | -23.81% | 19.33% | -25.44% | -36.55% | -33.25% | 29.63% | -37.30% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -17.55% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXPIX and SHPIX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2006 | 0.74 |
The correlation between UXPIX and SHPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXPIX vs. SHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UXPIX
SHPIX
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) and ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXPIX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.77 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.03 | -1.03 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | -1.83 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SHPIX drawdown of -96.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXPIX and SHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXPIX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.48% | -96.86% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.14% | -28.36% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.24% | -41.16% | -23.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.97% | -41.16% | -33.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.30% | -70.45% | -20.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.48% | -76.09% | -23.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.52% | -74.99% | -7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.41% | 16.78% | +4.63% |
Volatility
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) at 6.34%. This indicates that UXPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXPIX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.11% | 6.34% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.94% | 14.32% | +12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.68% | 19.70% | +11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 189.02% | -155.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 134.69% | -99.22% |
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UXPIX and SHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
UXPIX vs. SHPIX - Dividend Comparison
UXPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than SHPIX's 33.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.57% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | 4.10% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXPIX and SHPIX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXPIX has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to SHPIX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXPIX dropped -99.48% vs SHPIX's -96.86%.
UXPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.11 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXPIX and SHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer