UXPIX vs. DRCVX
UXPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund) and DRCVX (Comstock Capital Value Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX returned -20.65%/yr vs -4.23%/yr for DRCVX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for DRCVX.
Performance
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXPIX achieves a -19.11% return, which is significantly lower than DRCVX's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, UXPIX has underperformed DRCVX with an annualized return of -20.65%, while DRCVX has yielded a comparatively higher -4.23% annualized return.
UXPIX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- -19.11%
- 6M
- -19.38%
- 1Y
- -34.83%
- 3Y*
- -22.86%
- 5Y*
- -16.79%
- 10Y*
- -20.65%
DRCVX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 8.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- -4.23%
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | -19.11% | -40.68% | -0.70% | -23.81% | 19.33% | -25.44% | -36.55% | -33.25% | 29.63% | -37.30% |
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 2.94% | 11.55% | 2.02% | 6.55% | 4.13% | -2.16% | -5.36% | -25.76% | 7.76% | -20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXPIX and DRCVX is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2006 | 0.52 |
The correlation between UXPIX and DRCVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.54 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXPIX vs. DRCVX — Risk / Return Rank
UXPIX
DRCVX
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) and Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXPIX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.73 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 10.03 | -11.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 35.99 | -37.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum DRCVX drawdown of -97.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXPIX and DRCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXPIX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.48% | -97.47% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -0.89% | -33.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.11% | -3.82% | -60.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.88% | -4.08% | -70.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.27% | -54.27% | -37.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.48% | -96.62% | -2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.52% | -65.92% | -16.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.30% | 0.25% | +21.05% |
Volatility
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund (UXPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Comstock Capital Value Fund (DRCVX) at 0.90%. This indicates that UXPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXPIX | DRCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 0.90% | +9.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.02% | 1.91% | +25.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.68% | 2.92% | +28.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 4.57% | +29.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 9.78% | +25.75% |
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DRCVX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXPIX vs. DRCVX - Dividend Comparison
UXPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than DRCVX's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCVX Comstock Capital Value Fund | 1.91% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UXPIX ProFunds Ultra Short International Fund | 4.09% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXPIX and DRCVX have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXPIX has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to DRCVX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXPIX dropped -99.48% vs DRCVX's -97.47%.
DRCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXPIX and DRCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer