PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UXOC vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UXOC vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXOC achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.


UXOC

1D
0.16%
1M
5.91%
YTD
12.21%
6M
12.25%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-0.23%
1M
16.94%
YTD
21.85%
6M
31.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXOC vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UXOC and NVDO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UXOC vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXOC
UXOC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
UXOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UXOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXOC vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UXOCNVDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.98

UXOC vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UXOCNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.45

-0.41

Drawdowns

UXOC vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXOC drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXOC and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UXOCNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-16.25%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-5.00%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

Volatility

UXOC vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UXOCNVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

31.88%

-18.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

31.88%

-13.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

31.88%

-13.90%

UXOC vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXOC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

UXOC vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

UXOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UXOC and NVDO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXOC.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for UXOC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXOC and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UXOC and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer