UXJL vs. QMFE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and QMFE (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. UXJL is actively managed, while QMFE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMFE.

Performance

UXJL vs. QMFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than QMFE's 9.21% return.

UXJL

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 11.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMFE

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJL vs. QMFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.78%	9.31%
QMFE FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February	9.21%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJL and QMFE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

UXJL vs. QMFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMFE

QMFE Risk / Return Rank: 89
QMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJL vs. QMFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXJL	QMFE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.87	1.44	+0.42

Drawdowns

UXJL vs. QMFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum QMFE drawdown of -11.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and QMFE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJL	QMFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-11.76%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.20%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-1.09%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXJL	QMFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.90%	6.90%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	11.68%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	11.68%	+2.22%

UXJL vs. QMFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QMFE's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJL vs. QMFE - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXJL nor QMFE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJL and QMFE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, UXJL and QMFE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UXJL or QMFE?

On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJL or QMFE?

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJL or QMFE?

UXJL and QMFE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UXJL and QMFE?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.90% for QMFE.