UXJL vs. NFTY
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXJL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. UXJL is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
UXJL vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -7.30% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -7.62%
- 1Y
- -6.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
UXJL vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.46% | 8.62% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -7.30% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and NFTY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
UXJL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFTY
UXJL vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -47.67% | +37.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -15.26% | +11.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -9.60% | +8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility
UXJL vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 14.75% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 17.41% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 20.72% | -6.14% |
UXJL vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXJL vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.91% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXJL and NFTY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
UXJL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.80% for NFTY.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer