UXJL vs. FBUF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

UXJL vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 6.67% return.

UXJL

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 9.39%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 6.24%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 1Y: 17.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJL vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	11.03%	8.62%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	6.67%	9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJL and FBUF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

UXJL vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXJL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 82
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJL vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UXJL	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.84	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.09	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.96	—

Drawdowns

UXJL vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJL	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-11.09%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.03%	-1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-1.36%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXJL	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.22%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	8.19%	+6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.41%	9.62%	+4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.41%	9.62%	+4.79%

UXJL vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJL vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.58%	0.64%	0.54%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJL and FBUF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, UXJL and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, UXJL or FBUF?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJL or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJL or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.

What is the main difference between UXJL and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJL and 0.48% for FBUF.