UXJL vs. DLNV
UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) and DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. UXJL is actively managed, while DLNV is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
UXJL vs. DLNV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXJL achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than DLNV's 4.86% return.
UXJL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLNV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL vs. DLNV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 8.46% | 3.89% |
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 4.86% | 1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXJL and DLNV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXJL vs. DLNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXJL vs. DLNV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXJL drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than DLNV's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJL and DLNV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXJL | DLNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -4.83% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -0.65% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.64% | -0.94% |
Volatility
UXJL vs. DLNV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXJL | DLNV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.58% | 7.18% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 7.18% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 7.18% | +7.40% |
UXJL vs. DLNV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UXJL and DLNV have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
UXJL vs. DLNV - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXJL nor DLNV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, UXJL and DLNV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UXJL and DLNV have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
UXJL and DLNV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for UXJL and DLNV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer