UXJA vs. ROBT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. UXJA is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past year, UXJA returned 29.61% vs 30.71% for ROBT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UXJA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.

Performance

UXJA vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJA achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROBT

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 13.18%
• YTD: 14.22%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 30.71%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJA vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	11.66%	13.93%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	14.22%	9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJA and ROBT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.84

The correlation between UXJA and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UXJA vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 32
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJA vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UXJA	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.32	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	1.88	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.42	+1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	4.09	+8.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UXJA vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXJA and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXJA	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	1.32	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.35	+0.69

Drawdowns

UXJA vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJA drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJA and ROBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJA	ROBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.01%	-44.47%	+24.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-21.66%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-1.73%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-15.97%	+13.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	7.53%	-5.26%

Volatility

UXJA vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) is 3.40%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that UXJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXJA	ROBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	6.46%	-3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	17.51%	-7.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	23.32%	-9.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	25.18%	-6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	25.48%	-6.89%

UXJA vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJA vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXJA nor ROBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJA and ROBT in my portfolio?

UXJA and ROBT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UXJA or ROBT?

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to UXJA (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXJA dropped -20.01% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

Which ETF is better, UXJA or ROBT?

On 1-year performance, ROBT leads with 30.71% vs 29.61% for UXJA. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UXJA has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UXJA or ROBT?

Over the 1-year period, ROBT has performed better with a 30.71% return vs 29.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJA or ROBT?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJA or ROBT?

UXJA and ROBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UXJA and ROBT?

UXJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ROBT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJA and 0.65% for ROBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UXJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.