UXJA vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UXJA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

UXJA vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJA vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	0.65%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJA and BPH is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.03

Return for Risk

UXJA vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJA vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UXJA	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXJA	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	9.48	-8.43

Drawdowns

UXJA vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJA drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJA and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJA	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.01%	-2.35%	-17.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-1.08%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UXJA	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	25.75%	-12.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	25.75%	-7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	25.75%	-7.16%

UXJA vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJA vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXJA nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJA and BPH in my portfolio?

UXJA and BPH have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UXJA or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJA or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJA or BPH?

UXJA and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UXJA and BPH?

UXJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJA and 0.19% for BPH.