UXAP vs. TMAR
UXAP (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April) and TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. UXAP is actively managed, while TMAR is passively managed. Over the past year, UXAP returned 29.33% vs 28.83% for TMAR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UXAP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TMAR.
Performance
UXAP vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXAP achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 14.45% return.
UXAP
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMAR
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXAP vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UXAP FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April | 11.50% | 35.69% |
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March | 14.45% | 19.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXAP and TMAR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2025 | 0.62 |
The correlation between UXAP and TMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXAP vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank
UXAP
TMAR
UXAP vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UXAP | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.77 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 7.95 | -5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 38.42 | -25.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UXAP | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 3.06 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.18 | 2.25 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
UXAP vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXAP drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than TMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXAP and TMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXAP | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -9.93% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -3.64% | -6.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.72% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -0.66% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 0.75% | +1.54% |
Volatility
UXAP vs. TMAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) is 3.26%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that UXAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXAP | TMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 4.53% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 8.17% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 9.47% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 11.42% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 11.42% | +2.73% |
UXAP vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXAP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXAP vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither UXAP nor TMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UXAP and TMAR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMAR has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to UXAP (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXAP dropped -10.45% vs TMAR's -9.93%.
On 1-year performance, UXAP leads with 29.33% vs 28.83% for TMAR. On fees, UXAP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, UXAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UXAP has performed better with a 29.33% return vs 28.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UXAP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.
UXAP and TMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXAP and 0.95% for TMAR.
TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXAP and TMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer