UX vs. GUNR
UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) and GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. UX is actively managed, while GUNR is passively managed. Over the past year, UX returned 17.18% vs 41.45% for GUNR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for GUNR.
Performance
UX vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than GUNR's 19.20% return.
UX
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUNR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 19.20%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 41.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
UX vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | -0.61% | 15.76% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 19.20% | 24.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between UX and GUNR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025 | 0.37 |
UX vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UX
GUNR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
UX
GUNR
Basic Materials
UX
-
GUNR
Communication Services
UX
-
GUNR
Consumer Cyclical
UX
-
GUNR
Consumer Defensive
UX
-
GUNR
Financial Services
UX
-
GUNR
Healthcare
UX
-
GUNR
-
Industrials
UX
-
GUNR
Real Estate
UX
-
GUNR
Technology
UX
-
GUNR
Utilities
UX
-
GUNR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UX vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank
UX
GUNR
UX vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UX | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.48 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 6.12 | -5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 23.21 | -21.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UX | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 2.75 | -2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
UX vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and GUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UX | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.72% | -45.64% | +21.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.72% | -6.81% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.59% | -2.56% | -17.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.13% | -10.40% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.87% | 1.79% | +10.08% |
Volatility
UX vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 4.39%. This indicates that UX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UX | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 4.39% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.59% | 12.57% | +12.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.45% | 15.14% | +19.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 18.98% | +17.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 20.42% | +15.78% |
UX vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
UX vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison
UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than GUNR's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.24% | 2.81% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% |
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UX and GUNR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UX has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to GUNR (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UX dropped -23.72% vs GUNR's -45.64%.
On 1-year performance, GUNR leads with 41.45% vs 17.18% for UX. On fees, GUNR is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GUNR has performed better with a 41.45% return vs 17.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GUNR is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.
GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.49% for UX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UX and 0.46% for GUNR.
GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UX and GUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer