UX vs. CLIP
UX (Roundhill Uranium ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UX is a Uranium fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. UX is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, UX returned -0.88% vs 3.95% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. UX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.
Performance
UX vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UX achieves a -5.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.71% return.
UX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -5.87%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UX vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | -5.87% | 18.96% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.71% | 3.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between UX and CLIP is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UX vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
UX
CLIP
UX vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UX | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -80.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 26.35 | -25.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 141.67 | -141.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 1,281.30 | -1,281.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UX vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UX drawdown since its inception was -24.92%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UX and CLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UX | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -0.08% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.92% | -0.03% | -24.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.84% | 0.00% | -23.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -0.00% | -10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.97% | 0.00% | +12.97% |
Volatility
UX vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that UX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UX | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 0.07% | +7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.25% | 0.15% | +24.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.10% | 0.22% | +33.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 0.44% | +35.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 0.44% | +35.55% |
UX vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
UX vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
UX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than CLIP's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.90% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% |
UX Roundhill Uranium ETF | 1.57% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UX and CLIP have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UX dropped -24.92% vs CLIP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.95% vs -0.88% for UX. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UX.
CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.57% for UX.
UX is categorized as Uranium, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UX and 0.07% for CLIP.
CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.84 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UX and CLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer