PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. SOXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UWM vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 38.71% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 13.44%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.56% annualized return.


UWM

1D
-1.93%
1M
6.86%
YTD
38.71%
6M
32.01%
1Y
81.03%
3Y*
27.92%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
13.44%

SOXL

1D
-23.06%
1M
21.44%
YTD
450.61%
6M
429.57%
1Y
976.09%
3Y*
120.84%
5Y*
42.16%
10Y*
64.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UWM vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
38.71%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
450.61%54.91%-12.31%226.98%-85.66%118.84%70.04%231.83%-39.07%141.71%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and SOXL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010

0.70

The correlation between UWM and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

UWM vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UWM
SOXL

Technology

19.1%
100.0%

Industrials

17.8%

-

Healthcare

16.3%

-

Financial Services

15.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%

-

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Technology

UWM
19.1%
SOXL
100.0%

Industrials

UWM
17.8%
SOXL

-

Healthcare

UWM
16.3%
SOXL

-

Financial Services

UWM
15.5%
SOXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

UWM
7.9%
SOXL

-

Real Estate

UWM
5.9%
SOXL

-

Energy

UWM
5.4%
SOXL

-

Basic Materials

UWM
4.7%
SOXL

-

Utilities

UWM
2.7%
SOXL

-

Communication Services

UWM
2.5%
SOXL

-

Consumer Defensive

UWM
2.2%
SOXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXL
SOXL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UWMSOXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.58

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

22.69

-19.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

72.83

-60.36

UWM vs. SOXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the SOXL Sharpe Ratio of 8.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and SOXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UWM vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and SOXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMSOXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-90.46%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.28%

-43.47%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.79%

-87.88%

+38.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

-90.46%

+28.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

-90.46%

+19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-23.06%

+21.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-34.95%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

13.52%

-7.00%

Volatility

UWM vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 13.03%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UWMSOXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

68.39%

-55.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.39%

99.84%

-71.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.12%

116.79%

-77.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.16%

110.35%

-65.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.13%

100.62%

-54.49%

UWM vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UWM vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
0.03%0.34%1.18%0.51%1.07%0.04%0.05%0.38%1.30%0.09%4.84%0.00%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.74%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UWM and SOXL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to UWM (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs SOXL's -90.46%.

On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.56% vs 13.44% for UWM. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.56% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UWM.

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.

UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 0.75% for SOXL.

SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UWM and SOXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer