PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UWM vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 31.87% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has underperformed KORU with an annualized return of 12.16%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively higher 19.62% annualized return.


UWM

1D
-2.69%
1M
6.41%
YTD
31.87%
6M
28.56%
1Y
76.77%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
12.16%

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UWM vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
31.87%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and KORU is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.52

The correlation between UWM and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

UWM vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UWM
KORU

Industrials

17.7%
20.4%

Technology

17.0%
52.3%

Healthcare

16.5%
3.5%

Financial Services

15.8%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
5.8%

Real Estate

6.1%

-

Energy

6.1%
1.4%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.0%

Utilities

2.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
1.8%

Industrials

UWM
17.7%
KORU
20.4%

Technology

UWM
17.0%
KORU
52.3%

Healthcare

UWM
16.5%
KORU
3.5%

Financial Services

UWM
15.8%
KORU
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UWM
8.4%
KORU
5.8%

Real Estate

UWM
6.1%
KORU

-

Energy

UWM
6.1%
KORU
1.4%

Basic Materials

UWM
4.8%
KORU
2.0%

Utilities

UWM
2.9%
KORU
0.4%

Communication Services

UWM
2.4%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

UWM
2.4%
KORU
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UWMKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.72

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

35.65

-32.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

112.99

-101.14

UWM vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UWMKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

17.63

-15.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.28

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.25

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.13

+0.02

Drawdowns

UWM vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-95.79%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.28%

-61.39%

+39.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.79%

-73.71%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

-93.35%

+31.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

-95.79%

+24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-5.39%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.88%

-57.53%

+26.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

19.33%

-12.83%

Volatility

UWM vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 11.45%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UWMKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.45%

60.18%

-48.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.82%

110.71%

-83.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.04%

124.15%

-86.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.01%

85.11%

-40.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.08%

79.91%

-33.83%

UWM vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UWM vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than KORU's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%0.00%0.00%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.78%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UWM and KORU have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to UWM (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, KORU leads with 19.62% vs 12.16% for UWM. On fees, UWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 11.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KORU has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.14% for KORU.

UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UWM and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer