PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVV vs. VFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UVV vs. VFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Corporation (UVV) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVV achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, UVV has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 4.42%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -10.23% annualized return.


UVV

1D
-1.09%
1M
2.82%
6M
-3.87%
YTD
4.70%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
7.89%

VFC

1D
-4.28%
1M
-14.91%
6M
-26.13%
YTD
-19.96%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
-7.31%
5Y*
-26.75%
10Y*
-10.23%
ALL TIME*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.36M$11.73M$13.09M
$167.52M$128.15M$135.42M

UVV vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UVV
Universal Corporation
4.70%2.27%-13.39%35.79%1.82%19.59%-8.96%11.08%7.79%-14.79%
VFC
V.F. Corporation
-19.96%-13.83%16.64%-28.51%-60.38%-12.05%-12.00%51.70%-1.33%42.78%

Correlation

The correlation between UVV and VFC is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1988

0.25

The correlation between UVV and VFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UVV:

$1.31B

VFC:

$5.63B

EPS

UVV:

$1.94

VFC:

$0.89

PE Ratio

UVV:

27.10

VFC:

16.01

PS Ratio

UVV:

0.40

VFC:

0.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

UVV:

$2.21B

VFC:

$9.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UVV:

$412.39M

VFC:

$4.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

UVV:

$212.91M

VFC:

$826.88M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVV vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UVV
UVV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
UVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VFC
VFC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UVV vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Corporation (UVV) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UVVVFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

0.75

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

1.85

-1.41

UVV vs. VFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the VFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVV and VFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UVV vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVV drawdown since its inception was -69.75%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVV and VFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVVVFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.75%

-88.41%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-33.20%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.70%

-63.66%

+33.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-86.34%

+56.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.68%

-88.41%

+42.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-82.46%

+69.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-21.85%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

13.49%

-6.62%

Volatility

UVV vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Universal Corporation (UVV) is 7.36%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that UVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVVVFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

22.75%

-15.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.86%

36.49%

-16.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.04%

51.32%

-27.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

54.30%

-29.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.01%

45.42%

-16.41%

Dividends

UVV vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison

UVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than VFC's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UVV
Universal Corporation
6.24%6.18%5.87%4.72%5.95%5.64%6.30%5.29%4.80%4.11%3.33%3.71%
VFC
V.F. Corporation
2.51%1.99%1.68%5.27%7.28%2.69%2.26%1.91%2.65%2.32%2.87%2.14%

Financials

UVV vs. VFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Corporation and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UVV and VFC have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFC has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to UVV (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVV dropped -69.75% vs VFC's -88.41%.

VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVV and VFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer