UVIX vs. FMAY

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

UVIX (2x Long VIX Futures ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - UVIX is a Volatility fund tracking the Long VIX Futures Index (200% Daily), while FMAY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UVIX returned -81.87%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for FMAY. Their -0.74 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UVIX charges 2.78%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

UVIX vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVIX achieves a -52.21% return, which is significantly lower than FMAY's 6.33% return.

UVIX

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -11.91%
• 6M: -48.80%
• YTD: -52.21%
• 1Y: -86.41%
• 3Y*: -81.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -83.90%

FMAY

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 5.43%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 1Y: 12.97%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	$1.45M	$1.33M	$5.15M
UVIX 2x Long VIX Futures ETF	$104.04M	$96.41M	$155.15M

UVIX vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UVIX 2x Long VIX Futures ETF	-52.21%	-83.21%	-75.24%	-95.28%	-61.86%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	6.33%	12.69%	14.45%	17.83%	-8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UVIX and FMAY is -0.84, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2022	-0.74

The correlation between UVIX and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.84 to -0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UVIX vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UVIX

UVIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
UVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
UVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
UVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
UVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
UVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UVIX vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UVIX	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	1.90	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.69	2.73	-4.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.39	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.02	3.09	-4.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	15.38	-16.81

UVIX vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVIX and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UVIX vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVIX drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVIX and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	UVIX	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.98%	-13.60%	-86.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.53%	-4.22%	-80.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.42%	-13.12%	-86.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.98%	0.00%	-99.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.87%	-1.98%	-86.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	64.63%	0.84%	+63.79%

Volatility

UVIX vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

2x Long VIX Futures ETF (UVIX) has a higher volatility of 28.43% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 2.54%. This indicates that UVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UVIX	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.43%	2.54%	+25.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	85.88%	5.91%	+79.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	113.77%	6.86%	+106.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	135.10%	10.69%	+124.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.10%	10.14%	+124.96%

UVIX vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVIX has a 2.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

UVIX vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither UVIX nor FMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UVIX and FMAY in my portfolio?

UVIX and FMAY have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UVIX or FMAY?

UVIX has higher volatility (28.43%) compared to FMAY (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVIX dropped -99.98% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, UVIX or FMAY?

On 3-year performance, FMAY leads with 13.22% vs -81.87% for UVIX. On fees, FMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UVIX or FMAY?

Over the 3-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 13.22% return vs -81.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UVIX or FMAY?

FMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for UVIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UVIX or FMAY?

UVIX and FMAY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UVIX and FMAY?

UVIX is categorized as Volatility, while FMAY is Defined Outcome. UVIX tracks Long VIX Futures Index (200% Daily), while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.78% for UVIX and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.