UUP vs. LEMB
UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) and LEMB (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while LEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UUP returned 3.22%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LEMB. Their -0.53 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. UUP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LEMB.
Performance
UUP vs. LEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UUP achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than LEMB's 2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UUP has outperformed LEMB with an annualized return of 3.22%, while LEMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.06% annualized return.
UUP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.65%
LEMB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.20M | $7.38M | $6.50M | |
| $55.14M | $58.68M | $59.16M |
UUP vs. LEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 4.22% | -4.99% | 13.50% | 3.63% | 9.46% | 5.73% | -6.66% | 4.09% | 7.05% | -9.10% |
LEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 2.43% | 18.02% | -1.72% | 7.23% | -10.74% | -9.92% | 3.10% | 6.40% | -7.49% | 12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between UUP and LEMB is -0.65, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | -0.53 |
The correlation between UUP and LEMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (5 years) to -0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UUP vs. LEMB — Risk / Return Rank
UUP
LEMB
UUP vs. LEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UUP | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.27 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.58 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 5.07 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UUP vs. LEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UUP drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, smaller than the maximum LEMB drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UUP and LEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UUP | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -30.82% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.65% | -6.00% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.05% | -8.08% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.37% | -23.89% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.24% | -29.09% | +14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -3.70% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -12.64% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 1.87% | -0.54% |
Volatility
UUP vs. LEMB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) at 1.51%. This indicates that UUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UUP | LEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 1.51% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.11% | 5.66% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 6.63% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 8.24% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.89% | 9.16% | -2.27% |
UUP vs. LEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UUP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LEMB's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
UUP vs. LEMB - Dividend Comparison
UUP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than LEMB's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 2.38% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.86% | 3.89% | 0.00% | 4.39% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.29% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UUP and LEMB have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UUP has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to LEMB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UUP dropped -22.19% vs LEMB's -30.82%.
On 10-year performance, UUP leads with 3.22% vs 1.06% for LEMB. On fees, LEMB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UUP has performed better with a 3.22% return vs 1.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LEMB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.38% for LEMB.
UUP is categorized as Currency, while LEMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index, while LEMB tracks J.P. Morgan GBI-EM Global 15 cap 4.5 floor. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UUP and 0.30% for LEMB.
LEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UUP and LEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer