UTWY vs. LFSC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC).

UTWY and LFSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTWY is a passively managed fund by F/m Investments that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2023. LFSC is an actively managed fund by F/m Investments. It was launched on Oct 30, 2024.

Performance

UTWY vs. LFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UTWY vs. LFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF	-0.38%	4.82%	-2.85%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	-4.45%	56.54%	-6.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly higher than LFSC's -4.45% return.

UTWY

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -3.14%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.84%
• 1Y: -0.30%
• 3Y*: -1.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFSC

• 1D: 6.16%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: -4.45%
• 6M: 17.66%
• 1Y: 55.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWY vs. LFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LFSC's 0.54% expense ratio.

LFSC

F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF

UTWY

F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF

Return for Risk

UTWY vs. LFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWY

UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 11
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 13

LFSC

LFSC Risk / Return Rank: 86
LFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
LFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWY vs. LFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTWY	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	1.93	-1.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	2.65	-2.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.33	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	3.20	-3.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.11	8.96	-8.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTWY vs. LFSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWY Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the LFSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWY and LFSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTWY	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03	1.93	-1.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.94	-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and LFSC is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UTWY vs. LFSC - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, while LFSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF	4.68%	4.62%	4.56%	2.94%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. LFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum LFSC drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and LFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTWY	LFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-29.74%	+11.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-16.25%	+8.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.79%	-11.08%	+5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-8.25%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	5.80%	-2.39%

Volatility

UTWY vs. LFSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 3.39%, while F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTWY	LFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	10.35%	-6.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	19.97%	-14.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.30%	29.24%	-19.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.28%	29.31%	-18.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.28%	29.31%	-18.03%