PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWY vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTWY vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


UTWY

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
-0.54%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWY vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
-0.64%4.82%-4.92%-1.81%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and GSG is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023

-0.18

The correlation between UTWY and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to -0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTWY vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWY
UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWY vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTWYGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.40

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

5.47

-4.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.81

14.39

-12.58

UTWY vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWY and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTWYGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.26

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.09

+0.01

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWYGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.19%

-89.62%

+71.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-9.46%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.98%

-14.94%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-56.95%

+50.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-63.71%

+56.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.59%

-1.12%

Volatility

UTWY vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 2.50%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTWYGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

7.65%

-5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.64%

20.42%

-14.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

22.95%

-14.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

22.61%

-11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

22.03%

-10.92%

UTWY vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTWY vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTWY
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
4.69%4.62%4.56%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTWY and GSG have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to UTWY (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, GSG leads with 19.31% vs -0.54% for UTWY. On fees, UTWY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSG has performed better with a 19.31% return vs -0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTWY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

UTWY is categorized as Government Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTWY and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer