UTWY vs. GBIL
UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTWY tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index while GBIL tracks the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTWY returned -0.41%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for GBIL. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UTWY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
UTWY vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.99% return.
UTWY
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 1Y
- -1.66%
- 3Y*
- -0.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.63%
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.17M | $51.25M | $70.01M | |
| $108.36K | $60.31K | $63.45K |
UTWY vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | -3.22% | 4.82% | -4.92% | -1.86% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.99% | 4.12% | 5.24% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTWY and GBIL is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTWY vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
UTWY
GBIL
UTWY vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTWY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -154.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 95.18 | -94.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 192.70 | -192.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 2,308.02 | -2,308.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTWY vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTWY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.19% | -0.76% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -0.02% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.88% | -0.76% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.47% | 0.00% | -8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -0.04% | -6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.00% | +3.00% |
Volatility
UTWY vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that UTWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTWY | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 0.07% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.01% | 0.14% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.83% | 0.22% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 0.58% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 0.47% | +10.50% |
UTWY vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTWY vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than GBIL's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.36% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTWY and GBIL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTWY has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to GBIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs GBIL's -0.76%.
On 3-year performance, GBIL leads with 4.57% vs -0.41% for UTWY. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -0.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTWY.
UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 3.36% for GBIL.
UTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bellwether 20 Year Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 0.12% for GBIL.
GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.26 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTWY and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer