UTWY vs. BNDD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UTWY (F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF) and BNDD (Quadratic Deflation ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. UTWY is passively managed, while BNDD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTWY returned -0.43%/yr vs -4.21%/yr for BNDD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UTWY charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for BNDD.

Performance

UTWY vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTWY achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 6.53% return.

UTWY

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: -0.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDD

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: -4.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTWY vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF	0.13%	4.82%	-4.92%	-1.86%
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	6.53%	-8.17%	-6.65%	-1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between UTWY and BNDD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023	0.63

The correlation between UTWY and BNDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UTWY vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWY

UTWY Risk / Return Rank: 15
UTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
UTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
UTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 14
UTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
UTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BNDD

BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 15
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWY vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTWY	BNDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.42	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	0.66	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.08	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	0.72	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	1.55	-0.21

UTWY vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWY and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTWY vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWY drawdown since its inception was -18.19%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWY and BNDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTWY	BNDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.19%	-30.87%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-6.09%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.96%	-20.75%	+5.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-24.94%	+19.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-19.39%	+12.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.82%	-0.20%

Volatility

UTWY vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF (UTWY) is 1.92%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that UTWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTWY	BNDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	2.66%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.77%	8.27%	-2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.89%	10.49%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.05%	13.35%	-2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.05%	13.35%	-2.30%

UTWY vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTWY vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

UTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than BNDD's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BNDD Quadratic Deflation ETF	3.53%	3.82%	3.85%	4.30%	43.17%	1.04%
UTWY F/m US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF	4.65%	4.62%	4.56%	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTWY and BNDD in my portfolio?

UTWY and BNDD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTWY or BNDD?

BNDD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to UTWY (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTWY dropped -18.19% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

Which ETF is better, UTWY or BNDD?

On 3-year performance, UTWY leads with -0.43% vs -4.21% for BNDD. On fees, UTWY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTWY has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTWY or BNDD?

Over the 3-year period, UTWY has performed better with a -0.43% return vs -4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTWY or BNDD?

UTWY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for BNDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTWY or BNDD?

UTWY has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 3.53% for BNDD.

What is the main difference between UTWY and BNDD?

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTWY and 1.02% for BNDD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UTWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.