PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTWO vs. IBTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTWO vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTWO vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
0.25%4.79%3.71%3.45%-0.81%
IBTF
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF
0.00%3.81%4.60%4.12%-1.33%

Returns By Period


UTWO

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
0.25%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
10Y*

IBTF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.73%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
1.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTWO vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTWO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

UTWO vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTWO
UTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
UTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
UTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTF
IBTF Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTWO vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTWOIBTFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

7.41

-5.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.69

17.29

-13.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

4.32

-2.84

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

82.67

-78.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.93

244.42

-230.49

UTWO vs. IBTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the IBTF Sharpe Ratio of 7.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTWO and IBTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTWOIBTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

7.41

-5.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.45

+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between UTWO and IBTF is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UTWO vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison

UTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IBTF's 3.14% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
UTWO
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
3.48%3.63%4.22%4.39%1.22%0.00%0.00%
IBTF
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF
2.78%3.83%4.32%4.03%1.93%0.57%0.59%

Drawdowns

UTWO vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTWO drawdown since its inception was -2.04%, smaller than the maximum IBTF drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTWO and IBTF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTWOIBTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-10.45%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.90%

-0.04%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.49%

-3.42%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.01%

+0.24%

Volatility

UTWO vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison

US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that UTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTWOIBTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.00%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.86%

0.25%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51%

0.46%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

2.39%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.10%

2.60%

-0.50%