PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UTSL vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UTSL vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UTSL (Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - UTSL tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index (300%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTSL returned 8.66%/yr vs -6.50%/yr for TNA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTSL charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TNA.

Performance

UTSL vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 53.14% return.

UTSL

1D
3.20%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.90%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
—

TNA

1D
2.53%
1M
8.84%
YTD
53.14%
6M
40.13%
1Y
117.40%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
-6.50%
10Y*
8.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTSL vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares		6.35%29.03%54.24%-35.55%-14.06%48.16%-38.58%81.07%-2.27%11.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares		53.14%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%29.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UTSL and TNA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2017

0.31

UTSL vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UTSL
TNA

Utilities

100.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Energy

-

6.2%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Industrials

-

17.5%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Technology

-

16.9%

Utilities

UTSL
100.0%
TNA
2.9%

Basic Materials

UTSL

-

TNA
4.8%

Communication Services

UTSL

-

TNA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UTSL

-

TNA
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

UTSL

-

TNA
2.4%

Energy

UTSL

-

TNA
6.2%

Financial Services

UTSL

-

TNA
15.9%

Healthcare

UTSL

-

TNA
16.5%

Industrials

UTSL

-

TNA
17.5%

Real Estate

UTSL

-

TNA
6.2%

Technology

UTSL

-

TNA
16.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares

Often compared with UTSL:
UTSL vs. UPWUTSL vs. XLUUTSL vs. CUREUTSL vs. SOXLUTSL vs. UPROUTSL vs. TECLUTSL vs. WTIU
Often compared with TNA:
TNA vs. IWMTNA vs. TZATNA vs. URTYTNA vs. TQQQTNA vs. UWMTNA vs. SPXLTNA vs. MIDU

Return for Risk

UTSL vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UTSL
UTSL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTSL vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

UTSLTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.42
2.01

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.83
2.48

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.29

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.63

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

11.92

-10.61

UTSL vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTSL and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTSL vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and TNA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UTSLTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.55%

-88.09%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.45%

-32.53%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.22%

-65.78%

+19.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.01%

-82.36%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-88.09%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.69%

-35.23%

+13.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.19%

-33.92%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.87%

9.91%

+3.96%

Volatility

UTSL vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) is 17.03%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 21.54%. This indicates that UTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UTSLTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.03%

21.54%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.33%

42.61%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.73%

58.70%

-14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.08%

67.57%

-15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.23%

68.54%

-9.31%

UTSL vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTSL vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than TNA's 0.39% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares		0.39%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares		1.71%1.69%1.61%3.61%1.15%1.19%1.40%5.01%1.46%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

UTSL and TNA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to UTSL (17.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTSL dropped -79.55% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 5-year performance, UTSL leads with 8.66% vs -6.50% for TNA. On fees, UTSL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, UTSL has been the lower-risk option at 17.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UTSL has performed better with a 8.66% return vs -6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTSL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

UTSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 1.14% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTSL and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer