UTSL vs. NUGT
UTSL (Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - UTSL tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index (300%) while NUGT tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTSL returned 8.32%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for NUGT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTSL charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
UTSL vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -16.05% return.
UTSL
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -17.87%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- -5.29%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -6.64%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- -16.05%
- 6M
- -6.29%
- 1Y
- 97.46%
- 3Y*
- 60.96%
- 5Y*
- 16.32%
- 10Y*
- -8.54%
UTSL vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.14% | 29.03% | 54.24% | -35.55% | -14.06% | 48.16% | -38.58% | 81.07% | -2.27% | 11.26% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | -16.05% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | -44.52% | 6.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTSL and NUGT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2017 | 0.21 |
UTSL vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTSL
NUGT
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTSL
NUGT
-
Basic Materials
UTSL
-
NUGT
Communication Services
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Consumer Defensive
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Energy
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Financial Services
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Healthcare
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Industrials
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Real Estate
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Technology
UTSL
-
NUGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTSL vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
UTSL
NUGT
UTSL vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTSL | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.83 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 4.18 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTSL | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.09 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.33 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
UTSL vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTSL | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.55% | -99.97% | +20.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.45% | -53.58% | +25.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.22% | -53.58% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.01% | -73.72% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.53% | -99.80% | +74.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.23% | -91.52% | +58.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.34% | 23.39% | -10.05% |
Volatility
UTSL vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) is 16.50%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a volatility of 30.32%. This indicates that UTSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTSL | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | 30.32% | -13.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.86% | 75.18% | -40.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.41% | 90.01% | -46.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.02% | 71.96% | -19.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.28% | 87.90% | -28.62% |
UTSL vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTSL vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than NUGT's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares | 0.36% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares | 1.80% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 3.61% | 1.15% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 5.01% | 1.46% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTSL and NUGT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to UTSL (16.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTSL dropped -79.55% vs NUGT's -99.97%.
On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 16.32% vs 8.32% for UTSL. On fees, UTSL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, UTSL has been the lower-risk option at 16.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 16.32% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTSL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.
UTSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.36% for NUGT.
UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while NUGT tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 1.23% for NUGT.
NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTSL and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer