PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTRN vs. SAMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTRN vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UTRN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SAMT

1D
-0.66%
1M
6.66%
YTD
20.25%
6M
23.92%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
28.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTRN vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UTRN
Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF
0.00%-3.65%28.82%0.72%-12.19%
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
20.25%33.10%28.15%1.27%-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between UTRN and SAMT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.56

The correlation between UTRN and SAMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTRN vs. SAMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTRN
SAMT

Financial Services

36.4%
5.6%

Technology

31.9%
27.8%

Communication Services

8.0%
7.8%

Basic Materials

7.9%
2.7%

Energy

4.1%
2.9%

Industrials

4.0%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
5.6%

Healthcare

3.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

12.0%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Utilities

-

6.6%

Financial Services

UTRN
36.4%
SAMT
5.6%

Technology

UTRN
31.9%
SAMT
27.8%

Communication Services

UTRN
8.0%
SAMT
7.8%

Basic Materials

UTRN
7.9%
SAMT
2.7%

Energy

UTRN
4.1%
SAMT
2.9%

Industrials

UTRN
4.0%
SAMT
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UTRN
3.9%
SAMT
5.6%

Healthcare

UTRN
3.8%
SAMT
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

UTRN

-

SAMT
12.0%

Real Estate

UTRN

-

SAMT
2.9%

Utilities

UTRN

-

SAMT
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTRN vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTRN

SAMT
SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTRN vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF (UTRN) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UTRN vs. SAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTRNSAMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

Drawdowns

UTRN vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTRNSAMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

UTRN vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTRNSAMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

UTRN vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTRN vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

UTRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%1.40%1.49%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTRN
Vesper U.S. Large Cap Short-Term Reversal Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%1.06%2.75%1.09%24.51%9.09%3.77%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTRN and SAMT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SAMT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SAMT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UTRN.

SAMT has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for UTRN.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Strategas. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UTRN and 0.66% for SAMT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTRN and SAMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer