PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTRE vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTRE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTRE achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


UTRE

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
0.06%
1Y
2.93%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTRE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UTRE
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF
-0.09%5.68%2.96%2.16%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%34.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UTRE and QQQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2023

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTRE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTRE
UTRE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTRE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTREQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.51

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

13.49

-7.39

UTRE vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTRE and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTREQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.64

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.41

+0.84

Drawdowns

UTRE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTRE and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTREQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-82.97%

+80.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-11.96%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.86%

-22.77%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.26%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-32.79%

+32.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

3.11%

-2.63%

Volatility

UTRE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) is 0.58%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that UTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTREQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

4.49%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

12.10%

-10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02%

15.94%

-13.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.70%

22.38%

-19.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

22.29%

-19.59%

UTRE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTRE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

UTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
UTRE
US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF
3.50%3.60%4.01%3.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTRE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to UTRE (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTRE dropped -2.80% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.78% vs 3.64% for UTRE. On fees, UTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

UTRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

UTRE is categorized as Government Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. UTRE tracks ICE BofA Current 3-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTRE and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTRE and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer