PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTPIX vs. FNPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTPIX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, UTPIX has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.


UTPIX

1D
-4.62%
1M
-11.48%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
8.20%

FNPIX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
-10.42%
6M
-5.40%
1Y
-1.66%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
13.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
-0.11%19.28%27.74%-15.46%-2.31%23.33%-8.87%34.24%2.30%15.83%
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
-10.42%16.39%38.51%18.34%-23.84%57.11%-9.83%46.49%-17.23%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UTPIX and FNPIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2000

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between UTPIX and FNPIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTPIX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTPIX
UTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FNPIX
FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTPIXFNPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.34

-0.07

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

0.04

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

-0.06

+0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

-0.14

+1.56

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTPIX and FNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTPIXFNPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

-0.07

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.30

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.10

+0.14

Drawdowns

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTPIX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, smaller than the maximum FNPIX drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTPIX and FNPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTPIXFNPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-93.14%

+19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.82%

-22.37%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-23.21%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.73%

-37.80%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.82%

-58.23%

+7.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.82%

-14.22%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

-36.22%

+14.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

8.90%

-2.36%

Volatility

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund (UTPIX) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 4.61%. This indicates that UTPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTPIXFNPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

4.61%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.75%

16.26%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

21.41%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

27.37%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

30.66%

-1.60%

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTPIX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTPIX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison

UTPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.25%0.00%13.10%0.00%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTPIX
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund
0.77%0.77%0.00%1.74%0.97%0.20%0.58%1.72%0.66%0.74%0.83%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTPIX and FNPIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTPIX has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to FNPIX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTPIX dropped -73.56% vs FNPIX's -93.14%.

UTPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTPIX and FNPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer