PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTMAX vs. ABRYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTMAX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than ABRYX's 20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UTMAX has outperformed ABRYX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while ABRYX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.11% annualized return.


UTMAX

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.97%
YTD
8.60%
6M
9.30%
1Y
22.19%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
9.08%

ABRYX

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.60%
YTD
20.69%
6M
20.44%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTMAX
USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund
8.60%15.25%13.81%14.40%-20.44%21.52%13.42%22.64%-9.01%13.54%
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
20.69%8.50%3.34%6.34%-14.82%9.65%9.50%9.76%-6.73%9.97%

Correlation

The correlation between UTMAX and ABRYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.58

The correlation between UTMAX and ABRYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTMAX vs. ABRYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTMAX
UTMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UTMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UTMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ABRYX
ABRYX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ABRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTMAXABRYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.67

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

7.28

-4.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

26.53

-16.30

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the ABRYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTMAX and ABRYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTMAXABRYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

3.41

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.38

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTMAX drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than ABRYX's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTMAX and ABRYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTMAXABRYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-26.63%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-4.15%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.43%

-18.09%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-19.17%

-21.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.49%

-26.63%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.49%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-4.64%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.14%

+1.06%

Volatility

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) at 2.99%. This indicates that UTMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABRYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTMAXABRYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

2.99%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

7.91%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

8.87%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

12.18%

+10.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

10.90%

+8.42%

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTMAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRYX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTMAX vs. ABRYX - Dividend Comparison

UTMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than ABRYX's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
2.94%3.55%13.21%2.43%0.00%25.72%1.40%6.66%0.00%6.34%4.36%7.17%
UTMAX
USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund
6.32%6.87%1.59%1.41%4.47%27.44%5.94%4.84%11.05%1.13%1.36%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTMAX and ABRYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTMAX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to ABRYX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTMAX dropped -40.49% vs ABRYX's -26.63%.

ABRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTMAX and ABRYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer