PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABRYX vs. TFAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRYX achieves a 19.86% return, which is significantly higher than TFAQX's 9.92% return.


ABRYX

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.70%
YTD
19.86%
6M
20.03%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.99%

TFAQX

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.98%
YTD
9.92%
6M
8.29%
1Y
25.97%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
19.86%8.50%3.34%6.34%-14.82%9.65%19.44%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.92%11.41%22.12%23.25%-25.11%10.88%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ABRYX and TFAQX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABRYX vs. TFAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABRYX
ABRYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ABRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TFAQX
TFAQX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TFAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABRYXTFAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.32

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.99

2.09

+4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.40

7.16

+18.24

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the TFAQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRYX and TFAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABRYXTFAQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

1.79

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.60

+0.04

Drawdowns

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRYX drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, roughly equal to the maximum TFAQX drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRYX and TFAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRYXTFAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-27.78%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.15%

-12.85%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-21.59%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-27.78%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.48%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-8.48%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

3.72%

-2.58%

Volatility

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) is 3.08%, while TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that ABRYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRYXTFAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

3.87%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

11.00%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

14.95%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

17.38%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.90%

17.29%

-6.39%

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRYX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TFAQX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABRYX vs. TFAQX - Dividend Comparison

ABRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than TFAQX's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
2.96%3.55%13.21%2.43%0.00%25.72%1.40%6.66%0.00%6.34%4.36%7.17%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.24%10.16%0.00%0.03%5.06%20.52%4.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABRYX and TFAQX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAQX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to ABRYX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRYX dropped -26.63% vs TFAQX's -27.78%.

ABRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABRYX and TFAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer