UTMAX vs. ABRZX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX).
UTMAX is managed by USAA. It was launched on Aug 6, 2015. ABRZX is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Jun 2, 2009.
Performance
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTMAX USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund | -4.60% | 15.25% | 13.81% | 14.40% | -20.44% | 21.52% | 13.42% | 22.64% | -9.01% | 13.54% |
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 11.64% | 8.20% | 3.14% | 5.97% | -14.96% | 9.36% | 9.20% | 9.43% | -7.01% | 9.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTMAX achieves a -4.60% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, UTMAX has outperformed ABRZX with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ABRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.
UTMAX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -4.60%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
ABRZX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTMAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UTMAX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank
UTMAX
ABRZX
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTMAX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 2.03 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.63 | -1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 2.66 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 10.66 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTMAX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.03 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.33 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTMAX and ABRZX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison
UTMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%, more than ABRZX's 3.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTMAX USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund | 7.20% | 6.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 4.47% | 27.44% | 5.94% | 4.84% | 11.05% | 1.13% | 1.36% | 1.23% |
ABRZX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A | 3.03% | 3.38% | 13.28% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 26.02% | 1.18% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 6.43% | 4.41% | 6.91% |
Drawdowns
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTMAX drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than ABRZX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTMAX and ABRZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTMAX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -26.62% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -6.90% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -19.33% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.49% | -26.62% | -13.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -2.36% | -7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -4.79% | -6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 1.72% | +0.66% |
Volatility
UTMAX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Target Managed Allocation Fund (UTMAX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) at 3.98%. This indicates that UTMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTMAX | ABRZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 3.98% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 7.55% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.71% | 9.36% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 12.17% | +10.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 10.88% | +8.36% |