UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L).
UTIP.L and ITPA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTIP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. ITPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD). It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. Both UTIP.L and ITPA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTIP.L SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF | 0.06% | 759.16% | -165.03% |
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.11% | 6.54% | 1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTIP.L achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than ITPA.L's 0.11% return.
UTIP.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- -170.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- 162.70%
ITPA.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- 2.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTIP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ITPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
UTIP.L
ITPA.L
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTIP.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | 0.51 | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | 0.72 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.20 | 1.11 | -0.90 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -26.00 | 0.58 | -26.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -66.02 | 2.15 | -68.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTIP.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.82 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between UTIP.L and ITPA.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Dividend Comparison
UTIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 242.59%, while ITPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTIP.L SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF | 242.59% | 357.31% | 401.00% | 438.51% | 732.48% | 324.16% | 69.04% | 175.49% | 275.26% | 191.23% | 126.55% |
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTIP.L drawdown since its inception was -1,359.33%, which is greater than ITPA.L's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIP.L and ITPA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTIP.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1,359.33% | -4.08% | -1,355.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -171.94% | -4.08% | -167.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -181.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1,359.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -1.36% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -184.91% | -1.04% | -183.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.09% | +1.49% |
Volatility
UTIP.L vs. ITPA.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) at 1.34%. This indicates that UTIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UTIP.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 1.34% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.81% | 2.33% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 170.58% | 5.13% | +165.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 640.14% | 5.03% | +635.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 681.36% | 5.03% | +676.33% |