UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L).

UTIP.L and TIPG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTIP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. TIPG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Jul 29, 2016. Both UTIP.L and TIPG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTIP.L SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF	0.06%	759.16%	55.02%	-25.18%	-81.67%	990.92%	279.51%	-562.96%	-441.00%	-456.75%
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	2.04%	-0.42%	3.73%	-2.20%	-1.88%	7.15%	7.24%	5.48%	3.73%	-5.53%

Different Trading Currencies

UTIP.L is traded in GBP, while TIPG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TIPG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIP.L achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than TIPG.L's 2.04% return.

UTIP.L

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: -170.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: 162.70%

TIPG.L

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 0.58%
• 3Y*: 0.86%
• 5Y*: 2.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TIPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

UTIP.L

SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF

TIPG.L

Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

Return for Risk

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPG.L

TIPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TIPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TIPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TIPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
TIPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTIP.L	TIPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.08	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.00	0.15	-1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.20	1.02	-0.82
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-26.00	0.18	-26.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-66.02	0.33	-66.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTIP.L	TIPG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.21	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between UTIP.L and TIPG.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Dividend Comparison

UTIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 242.59%, more than TIPG.L's 1.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
UTIP.L SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF	242.59%	357.31%	401.00%	438.51%	732.48%	324.16%	69.04%	175.49%	275.26%	191.23%	126.55%
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	1.10%	1.12%	0.88%	0.72%	0.70%	0.55%	0.65%	0.78%	0.77%	0.82%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIP.L drawdown since its inception was -1,359.33%, which is greater than TIPG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIP.L and TIPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTIP.L	TIPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1,359.33%	-15.73%	-1,343.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-171.94%	-6.91%	-165.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-181.84%	-15.73%	-166.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-1,359.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	-7.42%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-184.91%	-7.20%	-177.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.79%	-1.21%

Volatility

UTIP.L vs. TIPG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) have volatilities of 2.14% and 2.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTIP.L	TIPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	2.16%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	4.50%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	170.58%	7.45%	+163.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	640.14%	8.71%	+631.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	681.36%	10.34%	+671.02%