ITPA.L vs. GILG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L).
ITPA.L and GILG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITPA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD). It was launched on Dec 8, 2006. GILG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Nov 10, 2020. Both ITPA.L and GILG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.26% | 6.54% | 1.72% |
GILG.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.80% | 4.23% | -0.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITPA.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than GILG.L's 0.80% return.
ITPA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GILG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 1.35%
- 5Y*
- -1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITPA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GILG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ITPA.L
GILG.L
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITPA.L | GILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 0.77 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 1.03 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 3.41 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITPA.L | GILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | -0.14 | +0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITPA.L and GILG.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Dividend Comparison
ITPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GILG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GILG.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.92% | 0.96% | 0.87% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.50% |
Drawdowns
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITPA.L drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum GILG.L drawdown of -24.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITPA.L and GILG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITPA.L | GILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -24.23% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -3.24% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -14.05% | +12.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -13.10% | +12.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility
ITPA.L vs. GILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) is 1.35%, while iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that ITPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITPA.L | GILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.83% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 3.13% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12% | 5.50% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 7.75% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 7.60% | -2.57% |