PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L).

UTIP.L and XG7U.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UTIP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. XG7U.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. It was launched on Feb 6, 2013. Both UTIP.L and XG7U.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF		0.06%759.16%55.02%-25.18%-81.67%990.92%279.51%-562.96%-441.00%-456.75%
XG7U.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged		2.64%-2.79%1.29%-1.07%-7.22%6.31%6.09%4.19%5.83%-5.75%
Different Trading Currencies

UTIP.L is traded in GBP, while XG7U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XG7U.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIP.L achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than XG7U.L's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIP.L has outperformed XG7U.L with an annualized return of 162.70%, while XG7U.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.83% annualized return.

UTIP.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
-170.22%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
162.70%

XG7U.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.22%
YTD
2.64%
6M
3.27%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
-0.49%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF

Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged

Often compared with UTIP.L:
UTIP.L vs. TPSA.ASUTIP.L vs. SPYUTIP.L vs. ITPS.LUTIP.L vs. GILI.LUTIP.L vs. ITPA.LUTIP.L vs. TIPG.LUTIP.L vs. GILG.L
Often compared with XG7U.L:
XG7U.L vs. SPYXG7U.L vs. XGEN.DEXG7U.L vs. XGIU.LXG7U.L vs. GILE.LXG7U.L vs. ITPS.LXG7U.L vs. TIP5.LXG7U.L vs. IGIL.L

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7U.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XG7U.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UTIP.L
XG7U.L
XG7U.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XG7U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XG7U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UTIP.LXG7U.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

—

0.12

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.00

0.22

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.20

1.03

-0.82

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-26.00

0.12

-26.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-66.02

0.20

-66.22

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UTIP.LXG7U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.12

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.04

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.25

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.29

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between UTIP.L and XG7U.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Dividend Comparison

UTIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 242.59%, while XG7U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF		242.59%357.31%401.00%438.51%732.48%324.16%69.04%175.49%275.26%191.23%126.55%
XG7U.L
Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIP.L drawdown since its inception was -1,359.33%, which is greater than XG7U.L's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIP.L and XG7U.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

UTIP.LXG7U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1,359.33%

-23.33%

-1,336.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-171.94%

-3.38%

-168.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-181.84%

-23.33%

-158.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1,359.33%

-23.33%

-1,336.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-11.11%

+7.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-184.91%

-6.11%

-178.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

0.97%

+1.61%

Volatility

UTIP.L vs. XG7U.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) is 2.14%, while Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that UTIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

UTIP.LXG7U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

2.98%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

5.76%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

170.58%

8.37%

+162.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

640.14%

10.32%

+629.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

681.36%

11.35%

+670.01%