PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIP.L vs. IMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIP.L is traded in GBP, while IMID.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IMID.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIP.L achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than IMID.L's 12.81% return.


UTIP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
-2.70%
5Y*
-2.60%
10Y*
41.75%

IMID.L

1D
0.04%
1M
5.41%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.92%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF
-0.61%-3.83%-0.45%-6.33%-8.86%4.03%279.51%55.61%0.86%
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
12.81%13.45%18.35%15.57%-7.85%18.96%12.72%20.58%-6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIP.L and IMID.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIP.L
UTIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UTIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

IMID.L
IMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIP.LIMID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.49

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

4.54

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

17.18

-16.81

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the IMID.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIP.L and IMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIP.LIMID.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

2.58

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.85

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.57

-0.22

Drawdowns

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum IMID.L drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIP.L and IMID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIP.LIMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-37.84%

+14.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-6.85%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.48%

-18.69%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.38%

-18.69%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.46%

-0.29%

-21.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-3.69%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.82%

+1.45%

Volatility

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF (UTIP.L) is 1.76%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that UTIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIP.LIMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

3.55%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.86%

9.34%

-4.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.14%

12.05%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.35%

14.26%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.48%

20.46%

+98.02%

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than IMID.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTIP.L vs. IMID.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTIP.L nor IMID.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMID.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTIP.L
SPDR Bloomberg US TIPS UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%69.04%31.90%67.27%43.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIP.L and IMID.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIP.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIP.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IMID.L.

UTIP.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IMID.L is Global Equities. UTIP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while IMID.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for UTIP.L and 0.40% for IMID.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIP.L and IMID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer