IMID.L vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
IMID.L and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMID.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both IMID.L and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMID.L or VT.
Key characteristics
IMID.L | VT | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.78% | 14.40% |
1Y Return | 21.53% | 21.84% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.33% | 5.57% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.90% | 11.22% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 8.73% | 8.88% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.78 | 1.87 |
Daily Std Dev | 12.32% | 12.36% |
Max Drawdown | -39.56% | -50.27% |
Current Drawdown | -0.67% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMID.L and VT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IMID.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMID.L having a 13.78% return and VT slightly higher at 14.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMID.L having a 8.73% annualized return and VT not far ahead at 8.88%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMID.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMID.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMID.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMID.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.89% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
IMID.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMID.L drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMID.L and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMID.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) is 3.72%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that IMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.