PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTG vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTG vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTG achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, UTG has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


UTG

1D
-1.44%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.10%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.17%

QQQX

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
8.70%
6M
11.35%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTG vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
12.62%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.70%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UTG and QQQX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

0.40

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UTG:

$3.63B

QQQX:

$1.39B

EPS

UTG:

$18.20

QQQX:

$7.57

PE Ratio

UTG:

2.22

QQQX:

3.75

PEG Ratio

UTG:

0.01

QQQX:

0.43

PS Ratio

UTG:

6.91

QQQX:

8.63

PB Ratio

UTG:

1.03

QQQX:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

UTG:

$525.39M

QQQX:

$160.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UTG:

$228.88M

QQQX:

$152.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

UTG:

$1.71B

QQQX:

$369.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTG vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTG vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTGQQQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.97

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

13.57

-9.10

UTG vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTG and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTGQQQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.86

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.45

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.47

0.00

Drawdowns

UTG vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTG drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than QQQX's maximum drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTG and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTGQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-57.25%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-9.11%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-22.80%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.54%

-29.33%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.91%

-35.96%

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-4.50%

-2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.74%

-8.02%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.22%

1.99%

+3.23%

Volatility

UTG vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 5.11%. This indicates that UTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTGQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

5.11%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

11.92%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

14.60%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

19.86%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

21.09%

+0.52%

Dividends

UTG vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than QQQX's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.57%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.91%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTG and QQQX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to QQQX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTG dropped -67.77% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTG and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer