UTG vs. ARDC
UTG (Reaves Utility Income Trust) and ARDC (Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, UTG returned 10.23%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for ARDC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UTG vs. ARDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTG achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than ARDC's -1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, UTG has outperformed ARDC with an annualized return of 10.23%, while ARDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.32% annualized return.
UTG
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 23.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
ARDC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- -2.63%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
UTG vs. ARDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust | 13.63% | 23.24% | 28.10% | 2.84% | -13.38% | 14.26% | -5.25% | 33.65% | 1.84% | 6.74% |
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | -1.07% | -3.10% | 21.05% | 32.35% | -22.21% | 23.12% | 2.56% | 21.26% | -8.80% | 17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTG and ARDC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012 | 0.27 |
The correlation between UTG and ARDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UTG:
$3.66B
ARDC:
$301.73M
UTG:
$18.20
ARDC:
$2.52
UTG:
2.24
ARDC:
4.99
UTG:
0.01
ARDC:
0.05
UTG:
6.97
ARDC:
3.43
UTG:
1.04
ARDC:
0.88
UTG:
$525.39M
ARDC:
$87.73M
UTG:
$228.88M
ARDC:
$56.87M
UTG:
$1.71B
ARDC:
$82.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTG vs. ARDC — Risk / Return Rank
UTG
ARDC
UTG vs. ARDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTG | ARDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.96 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | -0.17 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | -0.35 | +4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTG vs. ARDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTG drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than ARDC's maximum drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTG and ARDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTG | ARDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.77% | -45.40% | -22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -15.57% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.03% | -19.78% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.54% | -26.48% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.91% | -45.40% | -2.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -8.60% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -6.64% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 7.51% | -2.20% |
Volatility
UTG vs. ARDC - Volatility Comparison
Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) at 2.42%. This indicates that UTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTG | ARDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 2.42% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 7.13% | +5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 9.47% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 13.78% | +3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 16.86% | +4.75% |
Dividends
UTG vs. ARDC - Dividend Comparison
UTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than ARDC's 10.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDC Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. | 10.72% | 10.19% | 9.33% | 9.85% | 10.31% | 7.16% | 8.40% | 8.40% | 9.35% | 7.58% | 8.45% | 10.51% |
UTG Reaves Utility Income Trust | 5.86% | 6.42% | 7.19% | 8.53% | 8.07% | 6.35% | 6.59% | 5.69% | 6.86% | 6.21% | 9.02% | 6.86% |
Financials
UTG vs. ARDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reaves Utility Income Trust and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UTG and ARDC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTG has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to ARDC (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTG dropped -67.77% vs ARDC's -45.40%.
UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTG and ARDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer