UTES vs. XLUI
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and XLUI (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLUI.
Performance
UTES vs. XLUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than XLUI's 8.84% return.
UTES
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
XLUI
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTES vs. XLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 5.02% | -0.68% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 8.84% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and XLUI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.79 |
UTES vs. XLUI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
XLUI
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTES
XLUI
-
Basic Materials
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Communication Services
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Energy
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Financial Services
UTES
-
XLUI
Healthcare
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Industrials
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Real Estate
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Technology
UTES
-
XLUI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. XLUI — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
XLUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UTES vs. XLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. XLUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than XLUI's maximum drawdown of -6.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and XLUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -6.01% | -29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -1.11% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -1.98% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.36% | — | — |
Volatility
UTES vs. XLUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | XLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 11.17% | +10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 11.17% | +9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 11.17% | +9.04% |
UTES vs. XLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. XLUI - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than XLUI's 12.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.44% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.35% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and XLUI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.35%, compared with 1.44% for UTES.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.35% for XLUI.
Find the right allocation for UTES and XLUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer