UTES vs. VTI
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. UTES is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTES returned 12.27%/yr vs 15.02%/yr for VTI. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
UTES vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.62% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 12.27%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
UTES vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and VTI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.37 |
UTES vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
VTI
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UTES
VTI
Basic Materials
UTES
-
VTI
Communication Services
UTES
-
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
VTI
Energy
UTES
-
VTI
Financial Services
UTES
-
VTI
Healthcare
UTES
-
VTI
Industrials
UTES
-
VTI
Real Estate
UTES
-
VTI
Technology
UTES
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
VTI
UTES vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.35 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 2.79 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 12.52 | -11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -55.45% | +20.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -8.92% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -19.30% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -25.36% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -35.00% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -2.14% | -6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -8.02% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 1.99% | +4.30% |
Volatility
UTES vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.50%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 4.50% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 9.82% | +7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 12.64% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 17.47% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 18.33% | +1.84% |
UTES vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and VTI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer