UTES vs. PWRD
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRD.
Performance
UTES vs. PWRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than PWRD's 19.81% return.
UTES
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -6.58%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTES vs. PWRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.08% | 5.01% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.81% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and PWRD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. PWRD — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
PWRD
UTES vs. PWRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTES | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTES | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.32 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
UTES vs. PWRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than PWRD's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and PWRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -14.12% | -21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.26% | -0.74% | -8.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -3.17% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | — | — |
Volatility
UTES vs. PWRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | PWRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 24.03% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 24.03% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 24.03% | -3.87% |
UTES vs. PWRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. PWRD - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.50% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and PWRD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PWRD is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.75% for PWRD.
Find the right allocation for UTES and PWRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer