UTES vs. ICSH
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTES returned 12.27%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
UTES vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 12.27%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
UTES vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.53% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and ICSH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.08 |
UTES vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
ICSH
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTES
ICSH
Basic Materials
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Communication Services
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Energy
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Financial Services
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Healthcare
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Industrials
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Real Estate
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Technology
UTES
-
ICSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
ICSH
UTES vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 6.59 | -5.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 43.88 | -43.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 290.20 | -288.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -3.94% | -31.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -0.10% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -0.10% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -0.73% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -3.94% | -31.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | 0.00% | -9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -0.08% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 0.01% | +6.28% |
Volatility
UTES vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 0.13% | +7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 0.29% | +16.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 0.39% | +20.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 0.48% | +20.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 1.06% | +19.11% |
UTES vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and ICSH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.27% vs 2.78% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer