PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. BBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. BBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than BBP's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has outperformed BBP with an annualized return of 12.40%, while BBP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.


UTES

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
7.86%
3Y*
22.78%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
12.40%

BBP

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
5.80%
6M
7.91%
1Y
45.02%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. BBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.08%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
5.80%33.15%3.32%17.88%0.85%-8.17%22.24%24.73%-13.95%24.07%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and BBP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.19

The correlation between UTES and BBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTES vs. BBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTES
BBP

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

UTES
100.0%
BBP

-

Basic Materials

UTES

-

BBP

-

Communication Services

UTES

-

BBP

-

Consumer Cyclical

UTES

-

BBP

-

Consumer Defensive

UTES

-

BBP

-

Energy

UTES

-

BBP

-

Financial Services

UTES

-

BBP

-

Healthcare

UTES

-

BBP
100.0%

Industrials

UTES

-

BBP

-

Real Estate

UTES

-

BBP

-

Technology

UTES

-

BBP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. BBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. BBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTESBBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.32

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

4.87

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.30

15.32

-14.02

UTES vs. BBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the BBP Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and BBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTESBBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.91

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.40

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.42

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.39

+0.30

Drawdowns

UTES vs. BBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum BBP drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and BBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESBBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-44.32%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-9.28%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-26.09%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-38.28%

+17.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

-44.32%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-6.47%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-12.02%

+6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

2.95%

+3.13%

Volatility

UTES vs. BBP - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) have volatilities of 7.40% and 7.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESBBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

7.61%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

18.43%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

23.76%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.60%

26.35%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

27.40%

-7.24%

UTES vs. BBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BBP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES vs. BBP - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.50%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and BBP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBP has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to UTES (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs BBP's -44.32%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.40% vs 11.61% for BBP. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BBP is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.79% for BBP.

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and BBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer