PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTBPX vs. QGRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTBPX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than QGRPX's -0.43% return.


UTBPX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
1.74%
ALL TIME*
1.98%

QGRPX

1D
2.14%
1M
-0.90%
6M
1.30%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
3.49%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
0.12%6.60%1.67%6.67%-11.74%-1.49%2.60%
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
-0.43%15.51%25.13%35.52%-25.57%29.14%14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between UTBPX and QGRPX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.21

Over the past year, UTBPX and QGRPX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTBPX vs. QGRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTBPX
UTBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UTBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
UTBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRPX
QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) and UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTBPXQGRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.25

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

0.75

+3.96

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the QGRPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTBPX and QGRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTBPX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum QGRPX drawdown of -30.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTBPX and QGRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTBPXQGRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-30.28%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-17.45%

+14.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-21.03%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.78%

-30.28%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-4.94%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-7.47%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

5.58%

-4.72%

Volatility

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) is 1.17%, while UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that UTBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTBPXQGRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

4.45%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

12.45%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

15.74%

-11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.90%

19.79%

-14.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

19.26%

-14.89%

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTBPX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTBPX vs. QGRPX - Dividend Comparison

UTBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than QGRPX's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
6.19%6.16%3.62%0.42%1.00%2.84%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
4.30%4.18%4.53%3.54%2.84%1.89%2.11%2.80%3.05%2.46%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTBPX and QGRPX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRPX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to UTBPX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTBPX dropped -16.84% vs QGRPX's -30.28%.

UTBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTBPX and QGRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer