PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UST vs. IQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UST vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UST achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 13.67% return.


UST

1D
-0.76%
1M
-1.53%
6M
-4.17%
YTD
-4.15%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
-0.33%
5Y*
-7.56%
10Y*
-2.45%

IQQQ

1D
-1.84%
1M
-1.65%
6M
11.37%
YTD
13.67%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UST vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
-4.15%10.26%-0.50%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.67%17.11%14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UST and IQQQ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UST vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UST
UST Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UST Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UST Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UST vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USTIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.26

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.34

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

7.74

-7.37

UST vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UST Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UST and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UST vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UST drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UST and IQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.99%

-20.41%

-27.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-11.13%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.13%

-4.54%

-34.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-3.63%

-11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.36%

+0.24%

Volatility

UST vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury (UST) is 3.14%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that UST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

7.78%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

14.34%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

17.62%

-8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

19.16%

-3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.15%

19.16%

-6.01%

UST vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

UST vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than IQQQ's 5.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
5.25%10.34%7.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
3.60%3.65%4.09%3.49%0.47%0.27%0.53%1.42%1.71%0.84%0.64%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UST and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQQQ has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to UST (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UST dropped -47.99% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 25.95% vs 1.32% for UST. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, UST has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 25.95% return vs 1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UST.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 3.60% for UST.

UST is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. UST tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 7-10 Year Treasury Index (200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UST and 0.55% for IQQQ.

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UST and IQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer