USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

USSL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF) and EQL.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - USSL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while EQL.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, USSL.TO returned 37.15% vs 20.53% for EQL.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USSL.TO charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EQL.TO.

Performance

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSL.TO achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than EQL.TO's 10.79% return.

USSL.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.62%
• YTD: 14.51%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQL.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 16.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
USSL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF	14.51%	13.42%	22.04%
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	10.79%	5.94%	14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between USSL.TO and EQL.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024	0.37

The correlation between USSL.TO and EQL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USSL.TO	EQL.TO
Technology	33.1%	18.3%
Financial Services	12.3%	14.4%
Communication Services	10.7%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.3%
Healthcare	9.8%	10.9%
Industrials	8.7%	14.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	6.5%
Energy	3.5%	4.6%
Utilities	2.5%	6.1%
Real Estate	2.0%	6.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	4.1%

Return for Risk

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSL.TO

USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

EQL.TO

EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USSL.TO	EQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.73	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	2.51	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.30	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	3.06	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	10.94	+1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSL.TO and EQL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USSL.TO	EQL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	1.73	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	1.05	+0.25

Drawdowns

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSL.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum EQL.TO drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSL.TO and EQL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	USSL.TO	EQL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.90%	-30.47%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-6.73%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.45%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-3.19%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	1.88%	+1.01%

Volatility

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) at 3.86%. This indicates that USSL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USSL.TO	EQL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	3.86%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	8.98%	+1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.08%	11.99%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.63%	14.54%	+5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	17.35%	+2.28%

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSL.TO has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than EQL.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

USSL.TO vs. EQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

USSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	1.26%	1.38%	5.37%	8.14%	8.91%	7.19%	9.96%	8.29%	1.35%
USSL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USSL.TO and EQL.TO in my portfolio?

USSL.TO and EQL.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, USSL.TO or EQL.TO?

On fees, EQL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, USSL.TO or EQL.TO?

EQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.34% for USSL.TO.

What is the main difference between USSL.TO and EQL.TO?

USSL.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EQL.TO is S&P 500. USSL.TO tracks S&P 500, while EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.34% for USSL.TO and 0.25% for EQL.TO.