PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USSL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF
-7.35%13.42%22.04%
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
-6.40%16.16%24.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSL.TO achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQL.TO's -6.40% return.


USSL.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQL.TO

1D
-1.82%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-4.71%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSL.TO has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQL.TO's 1.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSL.TO
USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQL.TO
QQQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSL.TOQQQL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.94

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.49

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.37

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.76

3.80

-1.04

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSL.TO and QQQL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSL.TOQQQL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.94

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between USSL.TO and QQQL.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSL.TO nor QQQL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSL.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum QQQL.TO drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSL.TO and QQQL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USSL.TOQQQL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-27.82%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-13.76%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-12.23%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-5.12%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

4.97%

-0.97%

Volatility

USSL.TO vs. QQQL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USSL.TOQQQL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.66%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

13.84%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

27.43%

-5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

25.82%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

25.82%

-6.03%