PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSH vs. XHLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSH vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSH achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than XHLF's 1.39% return.


USSH

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XHLF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSH vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USSH and XHLF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSH vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSH
USSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
USSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSH vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSHXHLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-41.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

11.75

-10.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

98.81

-95.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.91

670.31

-655.40

USSH vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is lower than the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSH and XHLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSHXHLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

12.43

-9.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.74

10.74

-8.00

Drawdowns

USSH vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSH drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSH and XHLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSHXHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-0.11%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-0.04%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

0.00%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-0.00%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.01%

+0.21%

Volatility

USSH vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund (USSH) has a higher volatility of 0.36% compared to BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) at 0.08%. This indicates that USSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSHXHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.08%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

0.22%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29%

0.32%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.53%

0.42%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.53%

0.42%

+1.11%

USSH vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSH has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSH vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

USSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than XHLF's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
USSH
WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Treasury Fund
3.64%3.67%3.22%0.00%0.00%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.85%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSH and XHLF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USSH has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to XHLF (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSH dropped -1.01% vs XHLF's -0.11%.

On 1-year performance, XHLF leads with 3.92% vs 3.27% for USSH. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHLF has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHLF has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 3.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USSH.

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.64% for USSH.

USSH tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 1-3 Year Laddered Index, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USSH and 0.03% for XHLF.

XHLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.43 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSH and XHLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer