PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSG vs. HYDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSG vs. HYDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSG achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than HYDW's 1.04% return.


USSG

1D
1.10%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.71%
6M
11.08%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*

HYDW

1D
0.15%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSG vs. HYDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.71%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
1.04%8.47%5.42%9.84%-7.86%2.77%5.51%6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between USSG and HYDW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.67

The correlation between USSG and HYDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSG vs. HYDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDW
HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSG vs. HYDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) and Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSGHYDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.66

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.19

12.66

-1.47

USSG vs. HYDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSG Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the HYDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSG and HYDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSGHYDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.88

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.56

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.58

+0.26

Drawdowns

USSG vs. HYDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSG drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, which is greater than HYDW's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSG and HYDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSGHYDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-17.75%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-2.09%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.00%

-3.64%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.00%

-12.68%

-14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.11%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-1.89%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.44%

+2.17%

Volatility

USSG vs. HYDW - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) at 0.74%. This indicates that USSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSGHYDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

0.74%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

2.26%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

2.95%

+10.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

6.40%

+11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

6.99%

+13.17%

USSG vs. HYDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HYDW's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USSG vs. HYDW - Dividend Comparison

USSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than HYDW's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HYDW
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
5.75%5.75%5.35%5.69%4.78%3.30%4.45%4.56%4.42%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.94%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSG and HYDW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USSG has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to HYDW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSG dropped -34.10% vs HYDW's -17.75%.

On 5-year performance, USSG leads with 14.04% vs 3.58% for HYDW. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYDW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USSG has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 3.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYDW.

HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.94% for USSG.

USSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYDW is High Yield Bonds. USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders, while HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for USSG and 0.20% for HYDW.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSG and HYDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer